65 4K 2023 Ultra HD 2160p

Story Movie

To earn money to cure his daughter, family man Mills, from the planet Somaris, takes on a two-year reconnaissance mission. Along the way, his ship enters an uncharted asteroid belt and crashes, falling apart on an unknown planet. Mills discovers the only survivor of the cryostasis passengers, 12-year-old Koa, and also discovers that the terrain is in mortal danger - after all, they were on Earth 65 million years ago. But there is still a chance for rescue, and to do so, Mills and Coa need to get to a rescue ship that is stranded on top of a mountain.

Review 4K Movie

Throughout its existence, cinematography has accustomed its viewers to the fact that it is capable of producing cinematic masterpieces. The situation is such that there are real masterpieces and there are masterpieces in quotation marks. There are just enough of the latter in nature. Of course, the creators of a particular film always believe, hope and believe that they are shooting something at least watchable and at most very interesting. You've probably already realized that the promising and potentially high-profile project '65' has rapidly burst into the camp of 'masterpieces'. A reasonable question stretches to the tongue - why?

Yes, because from the very first frames in the head of a whirlwind of questions. As you know, there is no time travel or teleportation in the film, hence the very first exclamations: why do they look like that, why do they talk that way, why do they use those words, how is the area where they live and what is the political system there. These and other potentially dangerous questions noticeably discourage viewer interest that things either get boring next, or there's something wrong with the audience. The script still presents everything in such a way that there's no way to do it without the whys.

The funniest thing that only the Beck-Woods duo could give out was to connect the appearance of an unexpected guest from the heavens on Earth 65 million years ago with a very important historical moment on our planet. No, how convenient these guys are, it's all stitched together! In case you thought this was a movie about dinosaurs, it's not. It's more a story about taking a notional $45 million, investing it in production, leaning on 'A Quiet Place' and Sam Raimi for publicity, and then failing miserably wherever you can. Adam Driver's career...

Threatened. He said he accepted the role because of his son's love of dinosaurs. He better not start blaming his son for his ruined career after a lot of years. By the way, there are no complaints about the actor. He is able to play the drama, you can empathize a little with his character, he is attractive as a protagonist. Like his young colleague Ariana Greenblatt, there is a great chemistry between them. But even they can't pull off an entire movie that is utterly empty, illogical and banally boring. The problem here is clear.

Praised out of the blue for the mediocre horror film 'A Quiet Place', the Beck-Woods duo can calmly answer all the claims and questions that this is science fiction. Like, it's all real, so it's silly to pick on. I'm sorry, but science fiction is different. And the fact that the main character, which suspiciously resembles one kind of mammal on Earth, calmly walks around in the middle of unknown terrain without any protective gear, just because the environment is suitable for it, is not childishly frowned upon. Ask, then, why John Wick and dinosaurs here? Adam Driver...

Keanu Reeves is already too old for his role, so he could perfectly be replaced by our young hero. He has an army background, long hair and facial hair. He's a veritable assassin against a horde of reptiles. But the dinosaurs in the movie are just for noise. They're just there, they're evil, they attack, they're all small at first, giants at the end. In general, this final battle with the Tyrannosaurs is not justified in any way. Just conveniently walked past the hostage heroes. Sorry, but if this is survival, it is clearly for the most unassuming audience.

A work of fiction should have its own system, which allows you to answer logical questions, give a reason to consider different probabilities, finally, get some impressions of what you can only imagine in your head. The duo of directors sort of complained that Steven Spielberg had taken the monopoly on dinosaurs for himself. But in 'Park' you can still believe in the theory of the origin of lizards, while '65' is not about them at all, but about making money first, and only then having kids. Man, where did the money come from 65 million years ago?!